On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 13:58 +0800, Shane Chrisp wrote: Well I can confirm that raising the score to 10 as below fixed the issue. It would appear that if SA marks the message as spam, then simscan would bounce it regardless of the score in the simcontrol file. Im using a score of 10 as none of the domains are using a score higher than this, but you would probably be able to set the required_hits to 100 if you wanted to.
Spamd: 2007-05-07 21:08:06.336703500 [678] info: spamd: clean message (8.6/10.0) for clamav:89 in 6.9 seconds, 18645 bytes. simscan: 2007-05-07 21:08:06.448404500 simscan:[2406]:SPAM REJECT (8.60/5.50):9.3654s:Any idea:... Shane > On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 13:25 +0800, Shane Chrisp wrote: > > In reply to my own message, I thought about the fact that I updated > spamassassin to version 3.2.0 the other day so I added > > required_hits 10.0 > > to spamassassin's local.cf and now the spamd logs are showing that the > tests are being compared against the score of 10. Im yet to see a > message which is above one of the client domains scores and below the > 10.0 threshold so im not sure if it fixes the issue yet. I will let you > know when it happens. > > Shane > > > Bill, (and others) > > > > Ive compiled the 1.3.1.shupp2 from your site and im noticind that the > > spamd logs show all messages testing against a score of 5.0 regardless > > of what the score is assigned to the domain or user in the simcontrol > > file. > > > > eg: > > 2007-05-07 13:01:29.778242500 [1621] info: spamd: identified spam > > (5.7/5.0) for clamav:89 in 7.5 seconds, 15920 bytes. > > > > and the message was rejected, yet the domain in question has a score of > > 6.8 in the simcontrol file. > > > > Has anyone else seen this and do you know of a fix for it at all? > > > > cheers > > Shane > > >
