Shane Chrisp wrote: > On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 13:58 +0800, Shane Chrisp wrote: > > Well I can confirm that raising the score to 10 as below fixed the > issue. It would appear that if SA marks the message as spam, then > simscan would bounce it regardless of the score in the simcontrol file. > Im using a score of 10 as none of the domains are using a score higher > than this, but you would probably be able to set the required_hits to > 100 if you wanted to. > > Spamd: > 2007-05-07 21:08:06.336703500 [678] info: spamd: clean message > (8.6/10.0) for clamav:89 in 6.9 seconds, 18645 bytes. > > simscan: > 2007-05-07 21:08:06.448404500 simscan:[2406]:SPAM REJECT > (8.60/5.50):9.3654s:Any idea:... > > Shane > >
I thought spam_hits was to be used with spam_passthru. So you would not rely on rejecting spam via spam_assassin's threshold, but only spam_hits in simcontrol. So that the point of spam_hits is so you can allow spam in under a certain threshold, say for going through an optional spam folder, rather than SMTP rejection. This is the only way that I've used spam_hits in the past rather than just turning off passthru. Regards, Bill
