On Sep 7, 2007, at 12:14 PM, Jose wrote:

Hello,
I'm looking for some advice about webmail clients. I'm still using sqwebmail because it's very lighter and accesses maildirs directly. Now I'm gonna move to a new server, and I'm looking for a new webmail client for my toaster. With more than 20,000 users accessing daily the webmail, I'm afraid the system gets very slow with a php-based client such Squirrelmail or Imp. Another solution is Openwebmail, a perl webclient that accesses maildirs directly (with a patch). So, what do you recommend ? Horde/Imp, Squirrelmail or should I sacrifice some beauty functions and use sqwebmail or openwebmail instead ?


I doubt you will find better performance than SqWebmail. All IMAP clients pale in comparison. But last time I checked, SqWebmail *still* didn't have a search feature, and some of the HTML is hard coded. Two things that made it less appealing. I've also found it ignores my "do not archive" settings, and always archives my sent mail.

Anyway, IMP is more feature filled, looks very nice, but is a bit sluggish. SquirrelMail has a really easy to use plugin architecture, uses its own imap functions (not the imap extension), so it's more appealing to work with in some regards. That's what I use currently.

You might also have a look at RoundCube. Itt uses AJAX nicely to have more of desktop feel to it, and the skin looks like Thunderbird. Looks very promising. But for performance, it's still IMAP and if you have a really really big mailbox like mine, it can be sluggish.

Regards,

Bill

Reply via email to