Hi Paul,

I've pushed a new toaster-master with either the review changes applied, or
the changes entirely taken out if they were too troublesome (workdir,
licensing_info changes).

Can you please check it and let me know if ok ?

Cheers,
Alex


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Paul Eggleton <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Hi Alex,
>
> On Tuesday 26 November 2013 18:28:21 Damian, Alexandru wrote:
> > I have a set of patches for review on:
> >
> >
> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=toaster/master
>
> Sorry for the delay (although we've had some changes in the mean time with
> the
> pkgdata changes). Reviewing the latest branch, most of the changes look OK,
> however I did notice the following:
>
> > bitbake: toasterui: record recipe licensing information
>
> If do_populate_lic doesn't execute in this build we won't have the license
> file
> with this method, right? Is that going to be a problem?
>
> > bitbake: toaster: update to Django 1.5.4
>
> I think if we do do this we need to provide people with instructions on
> how to
> use virtualenv to install 1.5.4 on their system. I'm also a bit concerned
> about us requiring one specific minor release because a number of distros
> are
> using 1.5 versions other than 1.5.4 - there shouldn't be any incompatible
> changes introduced in minor releases, so we ought to be able to work with
> any
> 1.5 release >= 1.5.4.
>
> > bitbake: toaster: enable debug mode
>
> You don't say *why* you're enabling this for all users - we don't normally
> turn on BBDEBUG by default. Why is this needed?
>
> > bitbake: toaster: save extra data related to executed tasks
> >
> >+import pprint
>
> This doesn't seem to be needed.
>
> > + 'workdir' : d.getVar("WORKDIR", True),
>
> We can't do this. Apart from a few bits of old code that really shouldn't,
> Bitbake knows nothing about WORKDIR, and that's intentional. If you
> absolutely
> need this, you'll need to collect it another way. I'm not even sure it
> makes
> sense when we're talking about a remote context, which we are going to be
> in
> soon; perhaps we should review how we handle this at the design level.
>
> > + 'filename' : d.getVarFlag(t, "filename"),
> > + 'lineno' : d.getVarFlag(t, "lineno"),
>
> I've run this past Richard, and he thinks that we should try partially
> enabling the variable tracking just for functions - sorry for going back
> and
> forth on this. What we'd need to do is check the performance impact of
> doing
> so - would you be able to look into that?
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
> --
>
> Paul Eggleton
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre
>



-- 
Alex Damian
Yocto Project
SSG / OTC
_______________________________________________
toaster mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/toaster

Reply via email to