Thank you Suresh garu. I will attribute that to the team.
What next is the big question. That is what I meant. That is my proposal only. That is the reason why I mentioned that the case is complete in one sense. In the very first case also we thought of helping Asma but they were out of our reach. We have no clues on where they are now. Even in Raju's case, we thought of helping his sisters in getting a job here and even to Raju once he recovers. They didn't come. Here also this is my proposal. An idea. To help the families on conditional basis that to after a good study. My point is we are trying to 'teach fishing instead of giving fishes'. Why to search from somewhere else and why not give the needy (if we can believe them and if we feel that they are capable of proper utilization of help to the extent required) a bit more support to tackle their problems in a good way. Hopefully they do not depend on us or some donors or some lenders, down the line. Note: Here 'they' means any needy families whom we supported or will be supporting in future. As a member, my point is that if we feel the people as genuine, if we feel that they are capable of managing things, then we can provide the support on condition basis, any amount that we give would be an interest free loan which they should pay in 'monthly' instalments. Only if they can agree to all our conditions, we will help, otherwise not. This is not for Divena's case alone. This is for all cases. Paparao garu is an exemption. Because Pranahitha and her friends are willing to pay the money that we have spent for Divena to be spent on Paparao garu. Let us discuss on our scope. -- Thank you. with regards, PRASANTHI. ---- When you want something, the whole universe conspires in helping you to achieve it.
