Hi Srinivas and all... :)

First...My apologies if my mail looked like a Hate Mail. My intentions
were nowhere close to anything so actually. Like I mentioned up
ahead..it was an open mail about all I had in mind.

Secondly...YES...we know all about this when we decided to help
Raju...and I did mention that I still stand by my words that there is
no qn about helping him. More of what I wrote was focussing on how we
should prioritise/work around future cases. If any of what I wrote
about what I feel about Rajus' family sounded otherwise...please
note..that it is because I seriously am against healthy, smart & sound
individuals not doing anything in times of their own familys' need.
Again...I can always be questioned what do I know about them to frame
that opinion. I would merely say..that this is my perception of
things...according to what I understand people through whatever I have
seen of this world :D I clearly said that money to me is not the qn
here. Its the attitude. If we can do something to change that...I
think we should. I shall respect Srinivas's thoughts & what he
said...since they are his perceptions/views. 

I NEVER SAID Chandra did a mistake in giving the cash. The thought did
shake me a little..since he had to borrow some money from his
collegues. I personally would never do that, though I understand the
situation and its demand. Simply my mental-makeup I guess. 

Also...in our earlier mails when we were discussing about Rajus'
details, whats his family background and so on...we read in the mails
that one of his sister expired by the news of his sickness. This aint'
true. We knew of this fact when we spoke to Raju n his dad when I was
back in hyd. She went sick I guess or something such. Dont' intend to
make it sound as if it lessens the gravity of the situation...just to
get a better picture of their family..if it helps in anyway.

Given & Said...there is no doubt we need to help Raju as much as we
can. But...I STRONGLY suggest...we emphasize more on boosting his
familys' individual capabilities and try put their skills to work. 

Chandragaru...thnks on ur mail. I can c ur picture of the situation
through ur words. And u actually did a good job jotting ur thoughts
down. I will admit here though...that I ALWAYS bet on my instincts
when it comes to personalities....giving them reasonable benefit or
doubt to wherever I can. I shall keep in mind ur opinions on this case
though, as a comparison/reference scale. 

Btw...if u all have noticed..I am using some slashes in my mail
subject header if the mails could be ignored or were off subject. I
wouldnt' really mail these to personal ids, atleast as of now. I might
surely do so after I get to know some of you more :) But ofcourse..if
I do end quarelling with someone...then I would definitely say sorry
through a group mail...and perhaps send some more
butter-quoted-apology-words to personal ids. 

Tkcr you all. Hope u all had a good weekend.
I soo cant' wait to hit bed. Super tired!

For now...
Divya

**************************************

--- In [email protected], "Srinivas Surya"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> All,
> 
> 01. Where cash needs to be given directly, it needs to be properly
> appraised of.
> > 
> By appraisal, I am referring to the situation & circumstances and
severity of need that is to be looked into. I dont say Chandra did a
mistake in giving out cash
> 
> 02. Another point in case, suddenly, it appears like too many people
are forming remote opinions on Raju's family. Were these same
questions not relevant at the time we took up the case? Lets stop hate
mail. Each has their own circumstances and situations. Unless we see
and understand what is Raju's situation and his family completely, we
shouldn't be forming opinions. 
> 
> 03. There indeed are too many mails, and most of them are almost
personal exchanges. It would help to categorise so we can read the
ones related to the group as a whole, or about some particular
need/case (Or pls mail directly to concerned person in case of
personal exchanges, something which I follow).
> 
> Peace,
> 
> Srinivas
>








Reply via email to