Hello Divya and others, Whatever we share are our personal opinions based on our experiences and instincts. Such sharing of our thoughts need not bother other members. We can discuss on particular topics and can then come to a conclusion.
When we are working as a group, we need not go by one person's personal feelings. We should keep ourselves in inquisitive mode and then think of the issue in hand from all angles. Being kind, caring and understanding is good, but at the same time we should never forget that we should be the same for all cases that comes our way. In order to do that, we should be willing enough to think from all angles and find out the facts. No one ever said that we should leave the case that we have taken up in the middle. But to raise money for the treatment @ Rs. 15k to 18k for month, is not a wise decision I think. We should think of a way through which Raju's family can generate money for themselves. Help them in finding it. Anyway this is my view. I await members' response on how to proceed with respect to Raju's case. (This is irrespective of Raju's family members' intentions or whatever, whether they might be good and helpless or taking advantage of a helping hand) Thank you. with regards, Prasanthi. --- In [email protected], "divyapryga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Srinivas and all... :) > > First...My apologies if my mail looked like a Hate Mail. My intentions > were nowhere close to anything so actually. Like I mentioned up > ahead..it was an open mail about all I had in mind. > > Secondly...YES...we know all about this when we decided to help > Raju...and I did mention that I still stand by my words that there is > no qn about helping him. More of what I wrote was focussing on how we > should prioritise/work around future cases. If any of what I wrote > about what I feel about Rajus' family sounded otherwise...please > note..that it is because I seriously am against healthy, smart & sound > individuals not doing anything in times of their own familys' need. > Again...I can always be questioned what do I know about them to frame > that opinion. I would merely say..that this is my perception of > things...according to what I understand people through whatever I have > seen of this world :D I clearly said that money to me is not the qn > here. Its the attitude. If we can do something to change that...I > think we should. I shall respect Srinivas's thoughts & what he > said...since they are his perceptions/views. > > I NEVER SAID Chandra did a mistake in giving the cash. The thought did > shake me a little..since he had to borrow some money from his > collegues. I personally would never do that, though I understand the > situation and its demand. Simply my mental-makeup I guess. > > Also...in our earlier mails when we were discussing about Rajus' > details, whats his family background and so on...we read in the mails > that one of his sister expired by the news of his sickness. This aint' > true. We knew of this fact when we spoke to Raju n his dad when I was > back in hyd. She went sick I guess or something such. Dont' intend to > make it sound as if it lessens the gravity of the situation...just to > get a better picture of their family..if it helps in anyway. > > Given & Said...there is no doubt we need to help Raju as much as we > can. But...I STRONGLY suggest...we emphasize more on boosting his > familys' individual capabilities and try put their skills to work. > > Chandragaru...thnks on ur mail. I can c ur picture of the situation > through ur words. And u actually did a good job jotting ur thoughts > down. I will admit here though...that I ALWAYS bet on my instincts > when it comes to personalities....giving them reasonable benefit or > doubt to wherever I can. I shall keep in mind ur opinions on this case > though, as a comparison/reference scale. > > Btw...if u all have noticed..I am using some slashes in my mail > subject header if the mails could be ignored or were off subject. I > wouldnt' really mail these to personal ids, atleast as of now. I might > surely do so after I get to know some of you more :) But ofcourse..if > I do end quarelling with someone...then I would definitely say sorry > through a group mail...and perhaps send some more > butter-quoted-apology-words to personal ids. > > Tkcr you all. Hope u all had a good weekend. > I soo cant' wait to hit bed. Super tired! > > For now... > Divya > > ************************************** > > --- In [email protected], "Srinivas Surya" > <srinivas.surya@> wrote: > > > > All, > > > > 01. Where cash needs to be given directly, it needs to be properly > > appraised of. > > > > > By appraisal, I am referring to the situation & circumstances and > severity of need that is to be looked into. I dont say Chandra did a > mistake in giving out cash > > > > 02. Another point in case, suddenly, it appears like too many people > are forming remote opinions on Raju's family. Were these same > questions not relevant at the time we took up the case? Lets stop hate > mail. Each has their own circumstances and situations. Unless we see > and understand what is Raju's situation and his family completely, we > shouldn't be forming opinions. > > > > 03. There indeed are too many mails, and most of them are almost > personal exchanges. It would help to categorise so we can read the > ones related to the group as a whole, or about some particular > need/case (Or pls mail directly to concerned person in case of > personal exchanges, something which I follow). > > > > Peace, > > > > Srinivas > > >
