Hi Suresh, Listening from you after a long time. I am happy that you attended the July meeting as well. Looking forward to meet you on the coming sunday.
It is not difficult, Suresh. We are just letting loose our thoughts on the logo. We want to give room to our creativity as well. The problem is most of us are not the artists. So we do not know how our ideas would look on paper/screen :) Let us see, if Nanduri Srinivas says 'yes', we will have our logo. --- In [email protected], "suresh adina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I am one of the least active members of the group, but keep reading the > mails. I am surprised getting the logo done is difficult. > > Just wanted to share my thoughts on this. Though the professional artists > may do an excellent job on the logo, it would have more meaning if done by > someone who is already involved in the cause. The true essence would come > from that. I am also quite sure that there are budding artists in this group > or among your friends who would like such an opportunity and would work > closely with the group's ideas and not impose theirs on us, which is likely > to happen with 'famous' artists. Unfortunately, my artistic skills are > extremely poor or else I would have taken a shot at it myself. In all > activities I have been involved, extremely good logos have come up as an > output of the members efforts. This is my opinion only. > > Since I do not have the artistic talent myself, instead of just expressing > my opinions, I have contacted a couple of students that I am associated with > in other activities regarding the same. They had done our group's logo which > was visually pleasing and quite creative as well. I am hoping to get some > responses from them in the next couple of days. As such we have that group > meeting on Wednesday and will bring it up again. I am sure something good > will come out of it. > > Similarly I hope others may know people who would like to try their own bit > for this. > > Cheers > Suresh A > > ps: I am also of the opinion MFH is the most highly overrated "painter" of > recent times. I would most certainly not call him an artist, for he is far > from ever being one in this lifetime. >
