Ok,
I am sorry, I should actually provide some information.
We use the GPL to protect the kernel. The virality of the GPL applies to
the "derived work" or "modified work as a whole" of the kernel.
Tomcat is not "derived work" of jboss, clearly, wouldn't you say? :). The
"modified work as a whole" done in jboss to integrate the Tomcat jar is the
MBean adapter (for JMX), the Tomcat Interceptors (classLoaders), and the
J2EE deployer that we have developed. Those are GPL, as per the GPL derived
work virality.
The GPL applies to derived work in distribution. Our distributions are GPL
kosher.
Please don't be afraid of it, and feel free to discuss it...
regards
marc
|-----Original Message-----
|From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 10:10 PM
|To: jBoss Developer; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [jBoss-Dev] Re: jboss on tomcat update
|
|
|| but at the same time, you have a problem with the GPL being
||viral so you give exceptions for people to use JBoss. Instead, what you
||should do is probably be using the MPL license which will solve your needs
||without having to constantly grant exceptions to people.
|
|???
|
|what 'exceptions'? we never granted 'exceptions'. Please explain.
|
||It is funny to me how you say that you are integrating our code which I
||think is great, but the real issue is that we can't integrate YOUR code
||because you choose to use the GPL license.
|
|why not? what exactly prevents you from integrating our work?
|Please be explicit,
|
|let's not work from hearsay and "impressions" of the GPL, the GPL
|is very explicit.
|
|regards
|
|marc
|
|
|
||
||Sigh.
|
|????
|
||
||-jon
||
||
||
