As a "piping" mechanism (as opposed to a "hooking" one) the kind
of thing Donald described is my favorite one.
My other $0.02 are that I agree 100% with Jon on this. People will
get confused if you have 2 different ways of using valves from a
minor version to the other.
Have fun,
Paulo Gaspar
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 02:22
>
> on 1/18/01 4:28 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > If you change the names and parameter orders a little, you have
> just quoted
> > the
> > new api for javax.servlet.Filter in the 2.3 Proposed Final Draft.
> >
> > I'd be game to change the Valve APIs to conform to this kind of
> pattern in a
> > 4.1
> > timeframe, if people prefer it. If we're ever going to do
> this, earlier is
> > better
> > (before too many valves that have to be changed get created).
>
> I'm almost thinking that this should be done for 4.0 because 4.0
> is going to
> be implementing the 2.3 spec and having two different filtering
> mechanism's
> doing essentially the same thing doesn't make much sense to me...
>
> -jon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
