Yes, you are right, porting JNDIRealm from TC4.0, shouldn't be a
difficult task.. and is the easy, lazy and right thing :).
In fact i think it's possible to abstract the realm implementation from
the container details, as the ongoing effort on jasper for example..
this would be a Good Thing (tm), to have a common realms codebase for
all Tomcat trees..
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Ellen Lockhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: viernes 11 de mayo de 2001 16:04
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: Re: [PATCH] LDAPRealm implementation
>
>
> I actually ported this one from a 3.2.1 implementation I did,
> with a few
> changes. But since there is now a JNDIRealm implementation,
> wouldn't it be
> preferred to have a counterpart to that one on the TC 3.3
> tree (same setup,
> etc.)?
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 6:52 AM
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] LDAPRealm implementation
>
>
> > I'll thanks you for porting the LDAPRealm implementation
> > to the TC 3.3 tree !)
> >
> > -
> > Henri Gomez ___[_]____
> > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .)
> > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
> >
> >
> >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Ellen Lockhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 3:45 PM
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Re: [PATCH] LDAPRealm implementation
> > >
> > >
> > >I apologize if my submission of an LDAPRealm
> implementation appeared
> > >presumptuous - at the time that I needed it, all I could find
> > >were emails
> > >from other people asking if there was one (upon doing web
> > >searches.) So
> > >after writing it and testing it out and getting the
> > >documentation clear, I
> > >volunteered it for tomcat, since it was something that a lot
> > >of other people
> > >could use too. Apparently some discussion has already
> gone on about an
> > >implementation of this, as I found it later when I had some
> > >more time to
> > >review the archives, and the tomcat 4 b4 release now has an
> > >implementation
> > >:-).
> > >
> > >The jakarta website encourages people to get involved; I
> am a little
> > >disappointed to not receive at least a "thanks but no thanks"
> > >response. But
> > >I am glad that there is now a realm implementation that will
> > >work with LDAP
> > >for tomcat.
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
