One small point comes to light now you've released this: version.h is quite a common thing to have on your include path; certainly under MS operating systems there tends to be a version.h already on the include path which may cause confusion. Any reason not to call it jk_version.h? jean-frederic clere wrote: > > Andy Armstrong wrote: > > > > jean-frederic clere wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have prepared a patch for configure.in to generate JK_EXPOSED_VERSION and > > > JK_VERSION. > > > The result is a file named common/version.h: > > > +++ > > > #define JK_EXPOSED_VERSION "mod_jk/1.2.0-dev" > > > #define JK_VERSION (((1) << 16) + ((2) << 8) + > > > (0)) > > > +++ > > > Any comments? - Otherwise I will commit it tomorrow - -- Andy Armstrong, Tagish
- Re: #define JK_VERSION in j-t-c (doesn't exis... jean-frederic clere
- Re: #define JK_VERSION in j-t-c (doesn't ... Andy Armstrong
- Re: #define JK_VERSION in j-t-c (does... jean-frederic clere
- Re: #define JK_VERSION in j-t-c ... Andy Armstrong
- Re: #define JK_VERSION in j-... jean-frederic clere
- Re: #define JK_VERSION in j-... Andy Armstrong
- Re: #define JK_VERSION in j-... jean-frederic clere
- Re: #define JK_VERSION in j-... Andy Armstrong
- Re: #define JK_VERSION in j-... jean-frederic clere
- Re: #define JK_VERSION in j-... Andy Armstrong
- RE: #define JK_VERSION in j-... Andy Armstrong
- RE: #define JK_VERSION in j-t-c (doesn't exist) GOMEZ Henri
- Re: #define JK_VERSION in j-t-c (doesn't exist) Andy Armstrong
- RE: #define JK_VERSION in j-t-c (doesn't exist) GOMEZ Henri
- Re: #define JK_VERSION in j-t-c (doesn't exist) Andy Armstrong
- RE: #define JK_VERSION in j-t-c (doesn't exist) GOMEZ Henri
- Re: #define JK_VERSION in j-t-c (doesn't exist) Andy Armstrong
- RE: #define JK_VERSION in j-t-c (doesn't exist) GOMEZ Henri
- RE: #define JK_VERSION in j-t-c (doesn't exist) GOMEZ Henri
- Re: #define JK_VERSION in j-t-c (doesn't exist) jean-frederic clere
- Re: #define JK_VERSION in j-t-c (doesn't exis... Andy Armstrong