Re: #define JK_VERSION in j-t-c (doesn't exist)

[Andy Armstrong]

jean-frederic clere wrote:
> 
> GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> >
> > >One small point comes to light now you've released this: version.h is
> > >quite a common thing to have on your include path; certainly under MS
> > >operating systems there tends to be a version.h already on the include
> > >path which may cause confusion. Any reason not to call it jk_version.h?
> >
> > +1 for jk_version.h
> >
> > Sure it will take less than 30ms to JF :)
> 
> Done, it was more 3 mn and 3 commits...

I saw them ;-)

Thanks

-- 
Andy Armstrong, Tagish