Rob S. wrote:


>>I like this compromise.  I will propose that we get rid of the 3.2 docs
>>on the site -- once I'm convinced they're similar enough.  There's still
>>that old "3.3 is a rogue release" sentiment floating around, and people
>>might not appreciate giving 3.3 implied legitimacy by making it the
>>"official" documentation...
>>
> 
> Woah, I thought the committers worked that out a long time ago. 


I was off the list for a while. I tried to read through the archives but all 
the vitriol gave me a headache. Did they just agree to disagree?  Do you 
think there'll be a problem with proposing to remove the 3.2 docs from the site?




-- 
Alex Chaffee                       mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jGuru - Java News and FAQs         http://www.jguru.com/alex/
Creator of Gamelan                 http://www.gamelan.com/
Founder of Purple Technology       http://www.purpletech.com/
Curator of Stinky Art Collective   http://www.stinky.com/

Reply via email to