<ducks from possible continuance of this thread>

=)

- r

On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:55:39 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A little late +1
> 
> Thanks to remove sources from binaries :)
> 
> That's how the majority of OSS projects works today.
> 
>  Source -> binaries (eventually packaging like RPM/DEB)
> 
> -
> Henri Gomez               ___[_]____
> EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED]              (. .)
> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
> 
> 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 1:18 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Sources in Binary Distributions
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Christopher Cain wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On a related topic, I was a little surprised to find a
> >source directory
> >> in my "dist" build.
> >
> >Well, "ant dist" ***is*** how binary distributions (for both
> >the nightly
> >builds and releases) are created, so this should not be too much of a
> >surprise :-).
> >
> >Craig McClanahan
> >



Reply via email to