On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Keith Wannamaker wrote: > Then we need to be sure to encode r->uri in the main branch > and to change r->unparsed_uri to encode(r->uri) in the 3.2 > branch. I am swamped now and will put it on a long todo > list.. if anyone beats me to it..... Well, I said that would be my preference, but it's a very delicate issue - maybe we should have a vote or discuss it more. The code change is easy, deciding one way or another is the real problem. Costin > > | -----Original Message----- > | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > | Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 6:10 PM > | To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > | Subject: RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues > | > | > | > | My current 'preference' is to use r->uri, as in the main branch ( and how > | it used to be ). That keeps rewrite working and is consistent with most > | apache modules. >
- RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues Larry Isaacs
- Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues Bill Barker
- Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues Bill Barker
- RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues Keith Wannamaker
- Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues Bill Barker
- RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues Larry Isaacs
- Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues David Rees
- RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues Keith Wannamaker
- RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues cmanolache
- RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues Keith Wannamaker
- RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues cmanolache
- RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues Ignacio J. Ortega
- RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues cmanolache
- RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues Ignacio J. Ortega
- Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues Bill Barker
- Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues GOMEZ Henri
- RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues GOMEZ Henri
- Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues Bill Barker
- RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues Larry Isaacs
- RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues Larry Isaacs