Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> > Use net.ServerSocketFactory instead of ServerSocketFactory.
> >
> > Index: java/WarpConnector.java
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file:
> > /home/cvspublic/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/java/WarpConnector.ja
> > va,v
> > retrieving revision 1.24
> > diff -u -r1.24 WarpConnector.java
> > --- java/WarpConnector.java 2001/10/22 21:44:21 1.24
> > +++ java/WarpConnector.java 2001/10/30 22:47:04
> > @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
> > import org.apache.catalina.Response;
> > import org.apache.catalina.Service;
> > import org.apache.catalina.net.DefaultServerSocketFactory;
> > -import org.apache.catalina.ServerSocketFactory;
> > +import org.apache.catalina.net.ServerSocketFactory;
> > import org.apache.catalina.util.LifecycleSupport;
> >
> > public class WarpConnector implements Connector, Lifecycle, Runnable {
>
> Agreed. I think we should forget the deprecation warnings, and have
> connectors which compile with both branches at the moment, as neither nod_jk
> or mod_webapp can be considered "branchable" (ie, both have a few issues
> which should be dealt with before).
>
> If people could help with the mod_jk for TC 4 bug(s) (like 4223), that would
> be great. JF ? Henri ? I don't have the time or expertise to do this.
About 4223 the actual cvs does not behave as described:
With mod_jk it returns -1
With TC standalone it blocks until the connection is broken.
Any hints?
>
> Remy
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
