This is for TC 3.3. As a result, we are only required to expose the certificates. However, there is nothing that prevents exposing other request attributes as a non-portable feature (and Ajp13 & JNI already do this).
However, it's also likely to be adopted in j-t-c which supports both 3.3 and 4.x. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Speed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:39 AM Subject: Re: Portable SSL Support > > > Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > > > To be consistant with 2.3 containers, I'd go with individually named > > > attributes. > > Fine with me. Anyone object to this? > > > > -Ekr > > I'm confused. Is this for Tomcat 3.x or Tomcat 4.x? I thought it > was the former, but all of the servlet 2.3 comments recently make > me now think it's the latter. > -Paul > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > *----* This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments. In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
