----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: Configuring Multiple Tomcat JVMs with Apache - Load Balancing


| When my work is done, Session Affinity will not be required in order to
| acheive load balancing. However, we should still want to use session
| affinity in our load balancing solution(s) for the simple reason that
| it will perform better.
|
| However, the session affinity between Apache and Tomcat 3 locks
| a user (based on her JSESSIONID) to a single Tomcat instance. Once
| the distributed session management solution is in place, Apache should
| 'prefer' NOT 'force' tomcat instance routing. This gives us a real
fail-over
| story. Administrators will be able to bring down Tomcat instances without
| blowing away 'logged in' users.
|
| Tom
|
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Cc: "Tomcat Users List (E-Mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:54 AM
| Subject: RE: Configuring Multiple Tomcat JVMs with Apache - Load Balancing
|
|
| | >there hasn't been done anything on that topic yet ?  What's
| | >the status of
| | >loadbalacing, either mod_jk or mod_webapp ?
| | >Is that political due to if loadbalacing is working properly
| | >there won't be
| | >any reason to take (buy) anything else than TC ?
| |
| | State of the art is that today only mod_jk could
| | handle load-balancing and only when connected
| | to Tomcat 3.2.x or 3.3.
| |
| | Tomcat 4.0.x support ajp13 protocol, used in mod_jk
| | but still miss a subtil feature (jvmroute) to be
| | able to keep the route to the good JVM in
| | session mode (SessionAfinity).
| |
| | But the current refactory of ajp protocol,
| | under ajp14 in jakarta-tomcat-connectors, will
| | fix somedays thanks to Costin and Kevin works :)))
| |
| | --
| | To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| | For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| | Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| |
| |
| |
|
|
| --
| To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
|
|


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to