Hi Remy, thanks for getting back to me. >Yes, why not. >Note that the feature is: >- a bit redundant with JK/JK2 load balancing, so it's not my top priority >personally >- currently in alpha/unsupported status
I'm not sure about the JK/JK2 load balancing feature, but from the name of it, I don't think they are redundant, they are two pieces that complete the puzzle. See my implementation only does session replication, nothing else. If you have JK/JK2 do loadbalancing between the different tomcat servers and session replication, then you are all good to go. A complete cluster solution. Where do I look at the JK/JK2 code? And where/to who do I send my files to be submitted to CVS? Filip ~ Namaste - I bow to the divine in you ~ Filip Hanik Software Architect [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.filip.net >-----Original Message----- >From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:02 PM >To: Tomcat Developers List >Subject: Re: In memory replication - a non intrusive approach > > >> Hi, first of all, my name is filip, hope you all are doing well. >> >> a few weeks back I wrote an email about clustering and if there was any >> initiative. >> I looked at the source code of Catalina, and it didn't appear to me that >it >> was a complete implementation since it was using regular UDP packets >without >> guaranteed delivery of messages between nodes. >> >> I implented an in memory session replication that works pretty well for >me, >> at least in the tests that I have ran. >> >> I also wrote complete docs (with the source code published) that you can >> find on >> http://www.filip.net/tomcat/tomcat-javagroups.html >> >> I'd like to contribute this source to the Tomcat/Catalina project and >> continue to develop it from there. >> >> So I have my question for the developers of Tomcat is: Could I add this >> source to the source of Catalina and continue to contribute to >the cluster >> implementation of Tomcat? > >Yes, why not. >Note that the feature is: >- a bit redundant with JK/JK2 load balancing, so it's not my top priority >personally >- currently in alpha/unsupported status > >If you want to fix it, then it would add more deployment options for a >clustered Tomcat (that's good). > >Remy > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
