> >JavaGroups is cool since it is pure, multiplatform Java, although > >(from what I know) it cannot fall back to TCP when multicast isn't > >available, > > JavaGroups is cool, thanks :), and yes, it does support TCP. :)) > > >What I'd like to do at some point is take Filip Hanik's TC4 session > >replication code (looking nice!) and make it switchable to use either > >Spread or JavaGroups, or other communication mechanisms for keeping the > >session data in sync. Pluggable messaging back-ends.. > > I would fully support this, I think it is a great idea! > > >FWIW, I'd like to see the in-memory session replication code as part > >of TC4 itself, with a pluggable messaging layer API that allows > >a separate messaging system to be used. > > yes yes yes, > I would say make the hook ins and interfaces in catalina, and then you can > just plug in any messaging system you want.
Well, apparently a lot of people would want that in j-t-c instead, and I think they are right. j-t-c/cluster should be a good name. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
