"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > a discussion of whether you'd want > to propose contributing MinTC to the standard distribution (so that it > could be built from the same source repository, and probably packaged > separately) -- either now or when you get a little further along at > complete success in passing all the tests. >
I was planning to bring it up after version 1.0 was out. That makes it easier to judge the code. And, to be honest, until a couple days ago I wasn't really sure MinTC could be made fully spec compliant. Multiple classloaders hitting the same jar is kind of funky around the edges (especially on bleeping PJAE, which has the crazy 1.1 "classloaders will not expose .class files through getResource()" restriction. They'll give you .clazz files, though <evil cackle>) I was thinking something like a "contrib" directory might be neat, but that's getting a little ahead of things. -- Christopher St. John [EMAIL PROTECTED] DistribuTopia http://www.distributopia.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
