>> NSIS is OSS so keep. > >Sure, no problem. > >The licensing terms seems ok to me, so I wanted to see if the >community was >ok about it (apparently not). > >So even if this installer is provided in addition to other OSS based >installers, it's not ok ? Since when is this project refusing >contributions >from companies, BTW ? There's no explicit endorsement required, and no >blinking ZeroG ad we'll have to put anywhere. They'll also provide the >installer script.
I don't refuse anything, just expose that I'd rather like an OSS Java installer. >Note: Did you notice what the httpd project was using for its >installers >(http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/apache_2.0.35- >win32-x86-no_ >ssl.msi) ? Doesn't seem OSS to me ... Yes you're right and I was thinking at them will clicking 'send button' for my previous email (I was hopping you didn't find it too quickly ;) ). Yes, Apache HTTP team use M$ stuff for 1.3 and 2.0 but I'm not a commiter there so... -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
