On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote: > Yes, I suppose it's one connector supporting many protocols, so maybe it > would be a good idea to do that, call the thing "Coyote" and merge the two > pages (esp since there is little HTTP/1.1 docs needed). Or make one main > page with sub-pages.
Porbably so - for the java side and server.xml there is no reason to confuse people. There is one connector - that's it. Probably even 'coyote' can be removed from the docs :-) - if we agree ( and so far it seems we do ) that Coyote is going to be the default connector ( and I believe we can get a majority for both 4.0 and 3.3 to support that ) - then it'll be just that, 'the' connector. That doesn't mean the others are not supported - just that we recommend one default. > I had a question about the autoconfiguration with JK 2. Is it the same as in > JK 1 ? If it's not, a large part of the documentation is stale. Yes, using the same code - I can move the config generator from o.a.ajp - but it's better to let people use the same class names. The autoconfig generates mod_jk1 config ( JkMount, etc ). For mod_jk2 the config is different, and a different autoconf will be used ( I'll send a proposal in the next mail ). Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
