[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm also -1 on Avalon - same reasons as Remy, plus more (
> the IoC madness/obsession,
? madness?
It's a pattern, would you say that someone has a "Factory" obsession?
> the over-design,
Please explain.
> ever-changing interfaces,
The Avalon 4 interfaces are stable.
They are not everchanging.
> logkit, etc.)
?
What does logkit have to do with framework?
> Some components are good, and the move to commons is great - but
> I'm strongly -1 on using the framework.
Please give me some more insight.
What you say seems to me like: Avalon is too good to be of any use.
If it were a bit more "hacky" I would use it.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
