Glenn Nielsen wrote: > > Proposal in General: > > The proposal is pretty vague on details. I have seen a number of > replies stating "That's an implementation detail". I for one would > like to see the proposal broken out into much more detail before > work starts. Perhaps we should take a step back and start asking > questions first so that there is more information and consensus for > a formal proposal. Questions like: > > 1. What code in Tomcat really smells bad? > 2. Based on the previews of the Servlet 2.4 and JSP 1.3 specs, > what major changes are expected. > 3. Are there any major new features needed? > > My fear is that work on Tomcat 5 will turn into a CVS version of > the wild wild west if the proposal isn't detailed enough. >
+1. I will be out of town this weekend. I'll be checking my mail, but I won't be able to participate as fully as I like for the next day or so. I can't expect everything to grind to a screeching halt because I'm not here. On the other hand, a discussion as important as this needs to take place over the course of a couple of normal business days so the entire community has a chance to give input. -- Christopher St. John [EMAIL PROTECTED] DistribuTopia http://www.distributopia.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
