[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It seems we have 3 -1 votes so far. While majority is required, I think > we all agree that getting everyone ( reasonable ) involved and comfortable > with the proposal is very important ( and one of the goals of 5.0 ).
+1. > Christopher: I think we should add your requirement for performance > testing to the proposal. In fact, we should add a whole section about > testing for 5.0. Would this satisfy you ? +1 to start a new commons subproject. If everyone else wants to see the bench webapp here, then I'll remove my -1. However, it sounds generic, and not at all dependent on Tomcat, so that's why I think it would be a lot better in the commons. > Glenn - I'm not sure what you ask for. The proposal adds no new > features (except the new servlet api), and we obviously can't > implement the next spec unless it's public. I understand your concern > about the time - but given that the code will be shared ( i.e. existing > code ) I don't think it should take years to get it done. Is there > any particular requirement you want to add to the proposal ? I added some details about the changes. > For everyone - the proposal is in CVS, and everyone can contribute > to it. One of the main goals is to improve the community, and that > means we should be more sensitive to other needs. If you have an itch, > please add it to the plan, as a goal for 5.0 ( some may not happen > in 5.0.0 ). Not many of the negative comments posted actually contained any suggestions, so I didn't see much worth integrating, except Glenn's comments about lack of detail. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
