Should connectors to IIS and Apache behave differently according to whether a webapp is deployed as a WAR file or as an uncompressed set of files on the disk? When the webapp is deployed "uncompressed", it should be easy enough to find the static files to server, but when it's an unpacked WAR file, it's unlikely IIS et al know how to read from the WAR file directly, or locate the temporary folder into which WAR file contents are unpacked (so that it can find static files).
- Chris B. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ignacio J. Ortega" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Tomcat Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:48 AM Subject: RE: [JK2] Trying 4.1.3 Beta + IIS > > De: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Enviado el: 26 de junio de 2002 0:35 > > > > > I can't really answer like that. The static files aren't > > supposed to get > > served by IIS here ? > > > > My setup is [uri:/examples/*] > > wk2.p file uri components, are Servlet spec compliant (more or less) so > you can specify that only *.jsp or an absolute path it's served by tc, > but you can too use it as webapp, how i used it.. dumping an entire url > subtree to tomcat to manage.. > > And remember they are mainly need in IIS, Apache can use JK2 directly, > without using at all the JK2 mapper.. > > > I can't think of anything funny the DefaultServlet would do over a > > simpler servlet. > > > > It isnt the DS, hmmm, but fail are repeatables, and most times , if you > keep getting the same file it eventually fails too.. > > > Saludos , > Ignacio J. Ortega > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
