> De: Chris Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: 26 de junio de 2002 9:53
> Should connectors to IIS and Apache behave differently > according to whether > a webapp is deployed as a WAR file or as an uncompressed set > of files on the > disk? When the webapp is deployed "uncompressed", it should > be easy enough > to find the static files to server, but when it's an unpacked > WAR file, it's > unlikely IIS et al know how to read from the WAR file > directly, or locate > the temporary folder into which WAR file contents are > unpacked (so that it > can find static files). I dont know what could be done if you try to run your app directly from a war, but it seems to me that to do nothing is the way to go :), it is simply a tradeoff.. An given that, to get static content served natively by the webserver, it's a performance measure, it's seems that there is a little contradiction with the possibility of run the webapp directly from the war, isn't it? Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
