On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 18:56, Henri Gomez wrote: > Quoting Bojan Smojver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 00:50, Henri Gomez wrote: > > > > Welcome back from holidays, > > Thanks > > > hope you had a good time... > > Rainy ;[
Sorry to hear that :-( > Yes, with latest Apache 2.0, modules should be compiled against the proper > Apache 2.0, so if you have a mod_jk built against 2.0.39, you need to recompile > it to make use of jk under Apache 2.0.40 ;( > > It will be a pain for many distributions and modules maintainers (binary), so I > hope HTTP 2.0 team will relax it a little or consider version update and > functionnalities updates. I was hoping it was a temporary thing. Otherwise it truly looked like a nightmare... > Yes, ie mod_jk-1.2.0-apache-2.0.40.so Yep, exactly. > I agree, and we refer to the jtc tag name instead of a particular tomcat version. > You could use mod_jk 1.2.0 tagged at tc 4.1.9 time with tc 3.3.1 That's right. On packaging, the file explaining the compatibility might also be included in the RPM itself. Bojan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
