On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Costin Manolache wrote:
> Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 12:22:18 -0800 > From: Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [VOTE] Making JMX required in tomcat5 > > The subject should be clear. The benefit is that we'll be able > to build more JMX awareness in the code without doing tricks - > each component will know about its ObjectName and will be > able to return ObjectName[]. > > I'm not proposing MBeans all over tomcat - modeler works very > well in transforming our components into model mbeans. > > We already have 3 +1 votes ( costin, Remy and Jean Francois ). > Add a +1 from me as well. > The only possible problem is the classical licensing issue > ( we must use mx4j - but I don't know if they passed the TCK > or if they will or if the TCK is available yet, etc ). > Has anyone asked the MX4J developers about this? That would seem to be the next course of action. > Costin > Craig -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
