----- Original Message ----- From: "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 12:58 AM Subject: Re: [5.0.7] New build by Sunday
> Bill Barker wrote: > > "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>Hi, > >> > >>I plan to make a new build available by Sunday. Comments ? Any issues > >>which would need to be resolved by then ? > >> > >>A number of issues have been filed about commons-daemon and the new > >>Windows .exe wrapper. Is anyone working on resolving them ? (Mladen, JF > >>?) I could have helped on that, but the requirement for Visual C++ > >>prevents me from doing so. Is there any way around ? > > > > Clicking through to the TC 5 bugzilla link, I don't see anything for > > commons-daemon on Unix. Could you provide bug #s? (and, yes, I'm very > > interested). > > There's nothing for Unix. The JSVC wrapper should allow using Tomcat as > non root on port 80. > > > For procrun, I pretty much understand the bugs now, but won't be able to > > meet a Sunday deadline (basically, I have MSVC on my work computer (but not > > my home), but the firewall there prevents me from having CVS access). If > > you are going to stick to a Sunday deadline, then the procrun bugs will be > > fixed in 5.0.8. > > All the bugs so far are with the (brand new) procrun for NT. Bugs 18220, > 21279 (IMO, to make things more reliable and keep it simple, procrun > should wait for the child VM to die before stopping everything, rather > than simply waiting until the stop method returns), 22174. > 5.0.8 is good enough :) It turns out that I had a bit of spare time this afternoon to look at this. I can give you a tomcat(w) that fixes 21279 and 22174. The binaries will be for my code, since I don't have CVS access here, and don't feel like doing the merge with JFC's commit manually. > > > You should also indicate if you need the the binaries (@see previous > > paragraph). If you do, my build-platform will be XP, but they should still > > work with W2K. > > Yes. I think JF made it so that procrun is supposed to run on Windows 9x > also. Do you think compiling on XP could still produce 9x compatible > binaries ? > > Thanks :) > > Remy > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments. In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
