Chad Johnson wrote: > I can't help with the benchmark software but I've got a question for > you. Generally speaking, how well does the gcj bytecode interpreter > perform? Is it purely and interpreter or does it do some jit'ing?
As far as I know, it's just an interpreter, but I may be wrong. However, any calls to native-code stuff will execute as native code so it's perhaps not quite as bad as it may seem. Gary --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
