Hi, >> Why is Geronimo using Jetty (presumably for servlets and maybe for HTTP >> connector) instead of Tomcat? > >Maybe because their top committers work with coredevelopers.net, and the >Jetty Release Manager is a coredeveloper himself....
Maybe, but the Geronimo front page (http://incubator.apache.org/geronimo/index.html) says "The aim of the project is to produce a large and healthy community of J2EE developers tasked with the development of an open source, certified J2EE server, that is ASF licensed and passes Sun's TCK reusing the best ASF/BSD licensed code available today and adding new code to complete the J2EE stack." Jetty is not ASF or BSD licensed, it's got its own license. This seems wrong to me. As an aside, every time I look at the Jetty web site I get annoyed at something else. Today's annoyance is the number of items on their "powered by Jetty" page (http://www.mortbay.com/mortbay/powered.html) that aren't powered by Jetty: Cactus? Cocoon? BrowserTunnel (decommissioned)? DieselPoint (mentions tomcat and other compatible servers, doesn't even mention Jetty)? The list goes on and on, I don't have time to get past D in the alphabet. And last time it was the 300K claim which they admitted on their list is false for any realistic context. I have to stop myself here, before I get too angry/frustrated. I just can't stand false advertising. Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
