Re: Mod_ajp initial

[Remy Maucherat]

Bill Barker wrote:
I'm with Graham on this.  Personally, I have very little interest in a
mod_ajp module, but I am interested in proxy_ajp, proxy_lb, etc.  Of course,
since j-t-c has long doubled as j-t-sandbox, this means that I'm +0 for
committing your stuff there.
 

I think Mladen's initiative is very good.
Until I'm shown a mod_proxy (with HTTP) with performance close to 
mod_jk, my opinion is that we can't use it.

Rémy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]