DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34227>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34227


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-03-30 04:00 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Actually, this means absolutely nothing to me:
> The race condition must be that the shared session object becomes unavailable 
to
> recyle and therefore is left with a positive access count.
> It seems you don't have a legitimate scenarion for your problem.
> 
> -> INVALID

Try a web page that has 2 javascript src tags each calling a servlet from the 
same web application container. The browser will hand that off to background 
threads (same ones used to download images) and bingo simultaneous servlet 
requests with same JSESSIONID cookie. So while yes its rather difficult for a 
user to pull off simultaneous requests on the same session a browser 
application 
has no such problem. You could probably see this one happen with a frame page 
with a servlet in each frame being called simultaneously as well, and multiple 
image generating servlets on a web page customizing output based on session. So 
I see more than one valid scenario for this.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to