On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Trevor Little wrote: > You're probably right about all the threads coming from the java > upgrade. We didn't have so many thread with java 1.1.8. I think that if you run your JVM with green-threads, then all the threads are wrapped up inside the java process. If you use native threads, then all threads are shown as processes. They really are threads though, so don't worry about what looks like a total of 500Mb or RAM being used! :) Kevin
- Can't happen happened Lacerda, Wellington (AFIS)
- Re: Can't happen happened Alec Bau
- why so many java processes for tomat 3.2b6... Trevor Little
- Re: why so many java processes for tom... David Knaack
- Re: why so many java processes for... Trevor Little
- Re: why so many java processes... David Knaack
- Re: why so many java proc... Trevor Little
- Re: why so many java ... Kevin Sangeelee
- Re: why so many j... Trevor Little
- Re: why so many java proc... Craig R. McClanahan
