I've been asking for an example or a working 4.1.29 or 5.0.16 workers2.properties file for a couple weeks now. Somewhere between 4.1.0 and 4.1.29, the workers2.properties file syntax has changed. I can get Apache 2.0.48 to talk to Tomcat 4.1.0 in-process, via mod_jk2.dll (2.0.43), on W2K without issue. Apache 2.0.48 doesn't work with Tomcat 4.1.29 using the same 4.1.0 workers2.properties file...
-----Original Message----- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Barker Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 7:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.0 & mod_jk Configuration It seems that the Jk2 syntax is: JkSet config.file /path/to/apache/conf/workers2.properties Of course, the syntax of workers2.properties is different from Jk1's workers.properties. I don't really use Jk2, so I can't comment much on what you need. You could try the docs ;-), or (better) search the archives for one of the many posted examples of a working file. "Brennon Obst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Attn: Bill Barker > > Dear usergroup, > > In my httpd.conf I have added my jk module sucessfully but my syntax > complains when I declair my workers file as follows. > > LoadModule jk2_module modules/mod_jk.dll > > # > # Configure mod_jk - sytax error apparently > # > JkWorkersFile conf/workers.properties > #JkLogFile logs/mod_jk.log > #JkLogLevel info > > The sytax error is: > > C:\Program Files\Apache Group\Apache2\bin>apache.exe -t > Syntax error on line 140 of C:/Program Files/Apache > Group/Apache2/conf/httpd.con > f: > Invalid command 'JkWorkersFile', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a > module not > included in the server configuration > > This use to work I am assuming with mod_jk however now it does not. > > I am using the guide located here: > http://raibledesigns.com/tomcat/ > > Thank you in advance, > > /brennon > > > > Thank you for the reply, > > > > Could you please clairify a few points. > > 1. Is the new home available for web access? > > It is just a re-packaging, nothing more. TC 5 doesn't contain the > o.a.ajp.** packages. > > > > > 2. For <Listener > > className="org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.config.ApacheConfig" > > modJk="/usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so" > > >>> Is this the same for tomcat 5? (notice ...ajp.tomcat4.config...)? > > > > <Listener className="org.apache.jk.config.ApacheConfig" ... /> > Everything else is the same. > > > 3. Is there a new version of the how-to for jk2/Apache2/tomcat5.0 ? > > > > Not yet (As another thread has pointed out, I'm not the best doc writer > :). The TC 4 docs are still vaild, once you change the package name > however. Also, ApacheConfig doesn't work with mod_jk2: It is only for > mod_jk. > > > Thank you in advance, > > > > Brennon Obst > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Barker > > Sent: Wednesday, 21 January 2004 4:42 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.0 & mod_jk Configuration > > > > > > As of 5.0.18, ApacheConfig and friends have moved to their new home in > > > the org.apache.jk.config package. With 5.0.18, there is no change in > > the functionality. It may be extended on future releases. > > > > "Brennon Obst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Tomcat 5.0 & mod_jk Configuration > > > by James Thornton <[EMAIL PROTECTED] PROTECTED] > Dec > > > > > <http://www.talkaboutprogramming.com/group/comp.lang.java.programmer/a > > rc > > hive > > > /2003-12-31.html> 31, 2003 at 12:34 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > What in tomcat 5.0's configuration for mod_jk differs from how you > > > would > > > > > > do it for tomcat 4.x? Is this documented anywhere? > > > > > > > > > > > > In the tomcat 4.x server.xml, I had: > > > > > > > > > > > > <Listener className="org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.config.ApacheConfig" > > > > > > modJk="/usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_jk.so" /> > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this the same for tomcat 5? (notice ...ajp.tomcat4.config...) > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried simply changing it to ...ajp.tomcat5.config... to no avail. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have posted this exact same thing and also do not have any avenues > > > > yet. Can anyone help us out here? thank you in advance, > > > > > > > > > Brennon Obst > > > > > > > > > Java Security Programmer > > > iEnergy Main Branch > > > 39 Melbourne St. / Brisbane > > > p. (617) 3846-6666 > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
