Hi, You can try out these step-by-step instructions:
http://www.yorku.ca/dkha/tomcat/docs/apache-tomcat-modjk.htm Regards, Daniel On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Antonio Fiol Bonn�n wrote: > Hello, > > I have tried to configure mod_jk as a load balancer WITH sticky sessions. > > I get the load balancing to work perfectly, but NOT the sticky sessions. > > This is what I tried: > > I set up 4 "ajp13" workers and 2 "lb" workers. > > Worker names are "t1_a", "t1_b", "t2_a" and "t2_b". > Load balancer names are "a" and "b", and they point to: > "a" --> "t1_a", "t2_a" > "b" --> "t1_b", "t2_b" > > t1_a --> tomcat 1 port X > t1_b --> tomcat 1 port Y > t2_a --> tomcat 2 port X > t2_b --> tomcat 2 port Y > > On Tomcat 1, jvmRoute is "t1". > On Tomcat 2, jvmRoute is "t2". (So, jvmRoutes are set-up). > > Am I missing something very obvious? > > Do jvmRoutes need to have the same name as the workers? I find that > strange, but I can't come up with something more logical... > > Thank you for any tip. > > Yours, > > > Antonio Fiol > > > P.S.: I am using two connectors on each Tomcat because one is configured > with scheme="http" secure="false", and the other is scheme="https" > secure="true". Our app relies upon that. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
