I've just finished reading the report and can find no where in the report that Tomcat failed....
It *does* indicate that the combination of Apache httpd and Apache Tomcat had problems - but the report does not indicate, as far as I can tell, which component reported the failure. Without knowing "where" the error came from and what the error was - it's impossible to determine if httpd or Tomcat was the source of the error. I wish the report would have detailed the configurations of all 3 tests as well as some of the errors that were received and where the error came from. That way we could more easily identify what the failing component was. Just my opinion though. On Friday 30 July 2004 05:40 pm, David Wall wrote: > It is worth noting that Sun Java Web Server has better performance than > Apache Tomcat; you can learn more about this from Sun Java Web Server vs. > Apache/Tomcat Benchmarks. > > The link to the KeyLabs report is at > http://www.keylabs.com/results/sun/SunONEFinalReport_Solaris.pdf > > Why would SunONE be anywhere from 2 to 5 times faster than Tomcat? > > They also suggest that Tomcat would start to show errors when loading 200 > users at a time, whereas SunONE could handle up to 500 users without any > errors. > > David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
