Hmm, it seems that keeping it in memory would provide better performance than writing it to disk...admittedly with a higher cost in terms of overhead.
I guess I still do not see the difference between a war file and a jar file other than the size - they are both zip files, they are both intended to simplify deployment, etc. It is just that the war file has to be unpacked while the jar file does not. That is what I do not understand...what makes it so much more difficult with a war file than a jar file? Larry >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/19/04 12:09 PM >>> FWIW, Tomcat 5.5 relies (or will rely) more and more on the work directory, as do other servers, for performance optimizations, hot deploy support, and other key features. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
