I think the "other reason" cited in the news does not apply to me. I use jk2. I like it because it is easy to configure. Of course, if people already have the jk configure in production, why would they bother upgrading to jk2 and creating a new learning curve? Look at how many sites still use Apache 1.3.
-----Original Message----- From: Thomas Charles Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: November 29, 2004 11:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: What Connector Should I Use? Hi, I'm trying to determine the correct connector to use these days. I've seen conflicting content on jakarta.apache.org: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/index.html 15 November 2004 - JK2 is officially unsupported! (http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/news/20041100.html#2004 1115.1) Is this the connector or the protocol? is mod_jk using the JK2 protocol? I'm very confused over this. Can some please enlighten me? Thanks in advance Reagards, Tom Robinson -- Thomas Robinson - IT Director Constant Stream Integration, Support, Development and Training Linux, Oracle, Windows, Networking (Daedalus Compass Pty Ltd) Cell: +44 (0)7879 428 968 132 Clifden Court, Clifden Road Work: +44 (0)20 8891 6262 Twickenham, Middlesex, TW1 4LR Fax: +44 (0)20 8891 6363 United Kingdom CONFIDENTIALITY: Copyright (C). This message with any appended or attached material is intended for addressees only and may not be copied or forwarded to or used by other parties without permission.
