Where can I find more information on not only the
official announcement, but the latest on the connector
development.  I have also been using JK2 for some
time, and was really happy with it.  

Thank you.


--- Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Boulay Arnaud wrote:
> > Looking for some more details on this crucial
> subject.
> > IMHO, the tomcat home site don't give clear
> information yet.
> > MOD-JK replaced by MOD_JK2 in the past few year
> > MOD_JK2 replaced by JK in the near future ???
> > I don't undestand, may you help me please.
> 
> Yes, that's true. JK2 is officially unsupported!
> 
> 
> To quote the official announcement:
> 
> JK2 has been put in maintainer mode and no further
> development will take 
> place. The reason for shutting down JK2 development
> was the lack
> of developers interest. Other reason was lack of
> users interest in
> adopting JK2, caused by configuration complexity
> when compared to JK.
> 
> JK2 will have it's successor within core
> Apache2.1/2.2 distribution.
> We have developed new proxy_ajp that is an addition
> to the
> mod_proxy and uses Tomcat's AJP protocol stack.
> It is developed in httpd-2.1 and integrated in it.
> We have also
> developed a new proxy_balancer module for load
> balancing http and
> ajp protocol stacks.
> 
> JK will be fully supported for all other web
> servers. The next JK
> release is planned for the end of November. Lots of
> code from JK2
> has been ported to JK.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Mladen Turk
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 



        
                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to