On the subject of your hope that "this engenders a
long" can the English be fixed in the subject before
this is archived? It's embarrassing.

--- Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> There are lots of reasons why this is not the way to
> code JSPs, Dola. 
> Let's start with one: REUSABILITY.
> 
> If I can read "between the lines" in your code, you
> are essentially
> using these classes to write HTML in sort of a Tiles
> way.  This is
> clearly a good thing and your ideas might be really
> worthwhile.  That
> is not at issue in what I have to say.  I am also
> not, at the moment,
> talking about the <%= whatever %> expression code,
> but rather only 
> the <% whatever %> scriptlet code.  You don't use
> <%! whatever %.
> declaration code.
> 
> The only way to reuse the code you wrote is to copy
> and paste.  (Often
> this is called "cut and paste" which makes no
> sense.)  If you
> consolidated and generalized the code off the page
> in some, say,
> Process class, then you could have something like
> <%=
> Process().process([whatever]) %> where "whatever"
> represents what is
> peculiar to this page alone and what is common to
> all like pages is
> included in the off-JSP-page Process process method
> code.
> 
> If you only made this change, then your page person,
> which might be
> the same person, would only have to write
> 
> <%= Process.process([whatever]) %>
> 
> on each page and would not have to write the code
> elsewhere either
> because that would already have been abstracted and
> done.
> 
> If we cannot all agree this is progress, then we
> probably cannot agree
> on the whole idea of getting code off the page at
> all.
> 
> I also like what Tim had to say because he
> recognizes that sometimes
> we have to write the particular code and abstract
> later as a business
> decision.  However, he does it in a way that
> recognizes that adhering
> as close to the principles of OOP as possible will
> make the later
> transition easy when duplicating code becomes an
> issue.
> 
> I hope this helps.  Let me say that I find that the
> principles of OOP
> can be defended and need not be adhered to out of
> blind faith.  It is
> better to find out what is up than to just follow
> the dictates of
> whomever.  Once again, good question.  I hope this
> engenders a long
> and useful thread.  If it did, we could save a lot
> of "ink" on the
> list.
> 
> Jack
> 
> 
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 07:07:21 -0800 (PST), Dola
> Woolfe
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just read this thread and didn't quite
> understand
> > it. If it means what it seems to mean on the
> surface,
> > I'm doing everything wrong.
> > 
> > Schematically, my typical JSP page looks like the
> > following (basically 100% code). Is this what
> Craig is
> > advising against?
> > 
> > <%@ page errorPage="ErrorPage.jsp"
> import="html.*"%>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] file="InitializePage.jsp"%>
> > <%
> >     Table table = new Table()
> >     .pAddH("#").pAddH("Action").pLN()
> >     .pAddC("1").pAddL(new Anchor("HelloPage.jsp",
> "Say
> > hello to my friend.")).pLN()
> >     .pAddC("2").pAddL(new
> Anchor("GoodByePage.jsp",
> > "Say good bye to my friend")).pLN()
> > ;
> > 
> >     MyTemplate template = new MyTemplate ("Main
> > Actions", table);
> >     Page pAgE = new Page(new MyHead("Data Tools"),
> new
> > Body(template));
> > %>
> > 
> > <%= pAgE %>
> > 
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail
> SpamGuard.
> > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> > 
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ------------------------------
> 
> "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make
> it float on its back."
> 
> ~Dakota Jack~
> 
> "You can't wake a person who is pretending to be
> asleep."
> 
> ~Native Proverb~
> 
> "Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary
> for eagles to be crows."
> 
> ~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~
> 
> -----------------------------------------------
> 
> "This message may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information.
> If you are not the addressee or authorized to
> receive this for the
> addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take
> any action based
> on this message or any information herein. If you
> have received this
> message in error, please advise the sender
> immediately by reply e-mail
> and delete this message. Thank you for your
> cooperation."
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 



        
                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to