So does jk_1.2.8, so, for new installs, why would I use it? The overwhelming answers that I've gotten offline have been don't bother, so that seems to be the best answer.
Thanks, -Matt On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Nikola Milutinovic wrote: > Matt wrote: > > >If jk2 is abandoned, why would I use it over jk_1.2.8? > >Platform reasons? Feature reasons? Performance reaosns? Other? > >Anyone? > > Well, for one, it works and I have a ready to run config files. > > Nix. [snip] Matthew Kozak Rutgers University-Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED] ************************************************************************** "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Ben Franklin ************************************************************************** --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]