Marc
If the performance of your app is not acceptable using mod_jk , you could
try other alternatives and still keep apache in front to serve static
content and use other modules.
You can use apache mod_proxy to forward request on 8080 [or whatever your
run tomcat on] to tomcat without going through mod_jk
There are pros and cons to take this approach, but it may suffice in your
case.
Hope it helps.
Bruno Georges
Glencore International AG
Tel. +41 41 709 3204
Fax +41 41 709 3000
"marc ratun"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
[email protected]
ail.com> cc:
Subject: mod_jk performance
14.09.05 13:46
Please respond Distribute:
to "Tomcat Users Personal? |-------|
List" | [ ] x |
|-------|
Hi,
I just read an article about webapp benchmarks [1] and they mentioned that
apache+mod_jk+tomcat is about 30% slower than pure tomcat.
This is sad. Until now I believed that the performance decrease with
apache/mod_jk would be marginal.
Putting apache/mod_jk before tomcat is very nice. I don't want to miss
it because it is a good way to integrate other modules.
Is there any way to speed up apache/tomcat cooperation?
Marc
[1] (german only) http://www.heise.de/ix/artikel/2005/10/124/
_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now!
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LEGAL DISCLAIMER. The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are strictly
confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a
named recipient.
If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying
to this email inserting the word "misdirected" as the message and delete this
e-mail from your system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]