> Do you understand how SSL/TLS works for "Client Authentication"?
I guess I know sufficient about SSL and client authentication.

> Do you think the client must obey everything mandated by the server?
???

> Try have a grasp how both ends *agree* on the "client authentication".
I want to know if there are any additional settings to be done on Tomcat
side ?
I know IE should atleast allow me to select a certificate to be sent to the
server by showing a dialog box.
It does not reach that stage.

Mandar

>
> Pae
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mandar Joshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 4:03 PM
> Subject: Client Authentication
>
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >I am using Tomcat 3.2 on WindowsNT 4.0. I have enabled SSL direct on
> tomcat.
> >If I access my server without client authentication it goes on well.
> >But if I specify client authentication then it gives me following error
on
> >the server screen
> >
> >2001-04-04 04:02:42 - Ctx(  ): 400 R( /) null
> >2001-04-04 04:02:42 - Ctx(  ): IOException in: R( /) Socket closed
> >2001-04-04 04:02:42 - Ctx(  ): 400 R( /) null
> >2001-04-04 04:02:42 - Ctx(  ): IOException in: R( /) Socket closed
> >2001-04-04 04:02:42 - Ctx(  ): 400 R( /) null
> >2001-04-04 04:02:42 - Ctx(  ): IOException in: R( /) Socket closed
> >
> >
> >The browser shows me Page Cannot be displayed error.
> >
> >This is how my server.xml entry looks like
> >
> ><Connector className="org.apache.tomcat.service.PoolTcpConnector">
> >            <Parameter name="handler"
> >
> >value="org.apache.tomcat.service.http.HttpConnectionHandler"/>
> >            <Parameter name="port"
> >                value="8443"/>
> >            <Parameter name="socketFactory"
> >                value="org.apache.tomcat.net.SSLSocketFactory" />
> >            <Parameter name="keystore" value="/tomcat/conf/newCerts" />
> >            <Parameter name="keypass" value="keypass"/>
> >            <Parameter name="clientAuth" value="true"/>
> >        </Connector>
> >
> >What could be wrong ?
> >
> >your help is appriciated
> >
> >Mandar
> >

Reply via email to