Yep - never had a problem with RedHat rpms on SuSE. The only difference is
that SuSE tends to stick stuff under /opt, whereas allot of RedHat RPM's
i've used in the past seem to put software under /sw. SuSE 7.0 currently
comes with 6CDs, 1DVD and 1500 apps. Not to mention over 600 pages of
documentation.
sam
----- Original Message -----
From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 11:20 PM
Subject: RE: Apache-SSL or Mod-ssl
> >We're deploying on SuSE 7.0 anyway. I prefer SuSE purely because:
> >a) you get shedloads of apps on the source cd's (less downloading)
> >b) yast is brilliant for admin stuff
> >c) They release new versions pretty frequently
>
> Redhat, Suse, Mandrake are all great distribs. You allways get
> binaries and sources. And all use RPM packaging.
>
> RPMs built on Redhat must works on Suse and Mandrake, at least
> the .noarch since they depend on java JVM and have nothing to
> do with kernel or glibc.
>
> Just test my RPMs under Suse, and if necessary send me the
> corrections to apply to have them works under Suse :)
>
