tomcat isn't as good as apache at serving static html files and images. also, with apache up and running you can do other stuff like execute cgi scripts and so on. -----Original Message----- From: Skinner, Dallas M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 May 2001 15:48 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Why Use apache Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a standalone mode, why should it be used in conjunction with apache? Thanks Dallas Skinner
- Re: Why use apache Ben Ricker
- RE: Why use apache Randy Layman
- RE: Why use apache Dennis Doubleday
- RE: Why use apache Cato, Christopher
- RE: Why use apache Tracy_Getz
- RE: Why use apache Randy Layman
- Re: Why use apache Ben Ricker
- RE: Why use apache Randy Layman
- RE: Why use apache Jord Sonneveld
- Why Use apache Skinner, Dallas M
- RE: Why Use apache Ronan Derby
- RE: Why Use apache David M. Rosner
- Re: Why Use apache Martin Mauri
- RE: Why Use apache Doug Fields
- Re: Why Use apache Martin Mauri
- Re: Why Use apache Nick Christopher
- Re: Why Use apache Milt Epstein
- RE: Why Use apache Mike Braden
- Re: Why Use apache Peter Davison
- Re: Why USe Apache JFC
- RE: Why Use apache Sadasivakurup, Jiji L.
