If I have all my static html and graphics loading off of other servers, is
there any reason to use Apache with Tomcat? Is the combination more stable
or is performance better with both running?
thanks
-dave
At 11:00 AM 5/2/2001, Ronan Derby wrote:
>tomcat isn't as good as apache at serving static html files and images.
>also, with apache up and running you can do other stuff like execute cgi
>scripts and so on.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Skinner, Dallas M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 02 May 2001 15:48
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Why Use apache
>
>
>Excuse me if this question is obvious. If Tomcat can be run in a standalone
>mode, why should it be used in conjunction with apache?
>
>Thanks
>
>Dallas Skinner
